Currently browsing category

Lancer

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution

Vehicle(s): 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR with Premium Pkg
Price as tested: CDN$41498 (GSR) CDN$52993 (MR)

Performance: Even though there are 2 different trim levels available for the 1st Canadian-bound Evo, there is only 1 engine available. Due to emission regulations, Evo’s legendary 4G63 have been replaced by 4B11 motor. While the 4B11 doesn’t have the aggressive rawness of its 4G63 predecessor, its level of performance prowess doesn’t fall short behind it. With 291 horses and 300 lb/ft of torque available in this 2.0 liter DOHC 16-valve turbocharged motor with advanced MIVEC variable valve timing, it isn’t hard to keep it in full boil at all time. Turbo lag is almost non-existence in order to keep with this new motor’s civilized nature. On the other hand, its hard for it to run breathless at it reaches through the redline. The GSR comes standard with close ratio 5-speed manual gearbox. The gear ratios are well-spaced for both accleration and cruising, even though we would prefer to have 1 more gear. The cruising is more relaxed on the highway with the addition of an overdrive gear. As with all Mitsubishi manual gearbox, the gates are well-defined but still somewhat notchy. Clutch is progressive with the right feel. If you find this 5-speed manual gearbox is just not good enough, Evo MR comes standard with Mitsu’s automated manual. Its TC-SST, which is Mitsubishi’s system to Volkswagen’s DSG. Its basically a system with dual clutch. The 1st clutch controls 1st, 3rd and 5th gears while 2nd clutch controls 2nd, 4th and 6th gears. Whenever a driver engages 1st or 3rd gear using the 1st clutch, for example, the 2nd clutch would pre-engaged 2nd and 4th for driver to prepare to up or downshift. This is currently the fastest and smartest shifting gearbox in the world, quicker than any race car driver who can handle clutch and gearbox like eating a donut. When it comes to shifting speed, CT-SST shifts as smartly and efficiently as VW’s DSG. Its as fuss-free and refined as one either. Given Mitsubishi’s technical prowess, we aren’t come to a surprise at all. The paddle shifters also work as smoothly and efficiently as column shifter without any sense of roughness. It is a perfect match for Evo 10′s civilized character, its an even better match for MR’s more luxurious character than hardcore GSR.

Handling: Its not only the Evo comes with a strong chassis and a great suspension, its excellent AWD system with ACD is an add-bonus to this wonderful dynamic package. What the ACD or Active Center Differential does is to provide 3 different settings for the driver. Driver can choose between Tarmac, Snow and Gravel on the steering-mounted control. This electronically-controlled multi-plate clutch center differential system works flawlessly on the racetrack as it provides utmost confidence to both experienced and non-experienced driver. It also allows a bit of an oversteer powerslide whenever a driver set it on tramac mode. On the snow mode, it would adjust the power transfer through the center differential to suit the driving situation. Its similar function as with the gravel mode. This system also smart enough to vectoring torque through front and rear through those settings. On the other hand, it has set a little bit of understeer before driver can react to an oversteer when pushed through the envalope. It allows driver to have enough adjustability before exiting a corner. As expected from a great driver’s car, the rack-and-pinion steering is razor sharp and very precise; along with excellent feedback at all time. As for ride comfort, GSR rides a bit more rougher than MR given its sportier suspension setting. However, it remains civilized enough for daily driving. MR, on a contrary, rides more comfortably on those roughness and patholes. MR’s level of ride control can be easily mistaken as an European sports sedan.

Brakes: With both large front and rear Brembo discs all around, plus standard ABS, Evo’s braking prowess is nothing less than amazing. It has to be one of the best braking systems I have ever experienced, maybe just slightly behind those in a Porsche. The stopping distance is short while pedal feel is simply outstanding. Not even a fade after those hard stops on the racetrack which is simply astounishing.

Interior: The biggest highlights of Evo have to be its exceptional Recaro sports seats and thick-rimmed 3-spoke sports steering, with both ACD control and paddle shifters on the MR. The rest of the interior is typical Lancer affair. That means cheesy plastic on the top half of the dashboard.

Conclusion: After years of anticipation, Canadian finally can get their hands on a Lancer Evolution. At the same time, WRX STi finally face its toughest competition as it enters 2nd generation in this tiny market. What the Evo differs from STi is the offer of a more luxurious and civilized trim level called the MR, which should be able to cater to those who want a rally car driving experience with the luxurious qualities of a sports sedan. But for ultimate driver’s choice, Evo GSR remains the one to beat.

OVERALL VERDICT FOR 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
=====================================
Performance: 5/5
Handling and ride/fun-to-drive: 5/5
Interior/ergonomics/user-friendliness: 4/5
Fit-and-finish/build quality: 4/5
Cargo/accessibility/layout: 4/5
Value-for-money: 4.5/5

Overall rating: 4.5/5

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

Vehicle: 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS with Sportronic CVT w/INVECS-3
Price as tested: CDN$24043

Performance: New Lancer’s powerplant is a colloboration program between DaimlerChrysler, Mitsubishi and Hyundai. With this partnership project, it has reduced the R&D time and money that this once-struggling Japanese carmaker needs. Another advantage is Mitsubishi engineers have plenty of resources for themselves to tune this motor to be competitive. With its DOHC and Mitsubishi’s advanced MIVEC variable valve timing technology, this 2.0L 4-cylinder engine has class-leading horsepower and torque. Its good for 152hp and 146 lb/ft of torque. Unlike the Lancer motors of old, its definitely not a sluggish performer. The throttle response is quick and linear. With 146 lb/ft of torque arrives at 4250 rpm, there are plenty of low-end grunt that is absence in its predecessor. The level of refinement and NVH of this powerplant matched the high standards set by Honda and Mazda engines. Our tester comes with the optional Sportronic CVT. Mitsubishi engineers have put lots of time when developing this unit and the result shows. Its a very efficient unit that rivalled those of the best in the market. Its possibly the best currently resides in econocar which better than even Nissan’s Xtronic. Although its better to leave CVT in “D” as the most efficient and economical driving mode, however, its paddle shifters work ergonomically with its thick-rimmed steering. It actually encourages the manuamtic use of the Sportronic as a match for Lancer’s sporty character.

Handling: With 53% higher torsional rigidty and 50% higher bending rigidty than the outgoing platform, Lancer’s chassis finally doesn’t show any crack and flex when pushed hard. Its an extremely stiff and strong chassis for suspension to hang its head. Its level of stiffness is even tougher than any Lancer Evolutions gone before this.

Its electric power steering provides decent feedback and response, its light and precise is what it should be. The suspension is firm without losing the ride comfort one expects from an econocar. Mitsubishi has tuned our GTS tester’s suspension more aggressively in order to reflect its character. You no longer need an Evolution in order to beat its peers. With the new chassis, even with base Lancer engine, it remains very capable car. Through the corners, its chassis dynamics and control are very competitive around its peers. There are slight understeer and body rolls as one expected from an entry-level sedan. But the result is a very composed and solid performer. Although the ride quality got somewhat busy when driven through washboard pavement, its impressive showing in twisties are what it is paid for.

Brakes: With its 4-channel, 4-sensor ABS and all discs around; our GTS tester performs surprisingly when it comes to stopping power. However, its a pity the base DE has to lump its ABS with air conditioning as a package. If Mitsubishi is able to afford to put 4-channel, 4-sensor into an econocar; they shouldn’t cut ABS into an optional package. What a pity!

Interior: In terms of material, its a huge leap forward over its predecessor. However, there are still lots of hard plastic on the top of the dashboard. The bottom half uses a much softer plastic material which is plaasing to the touch. The cloth seats are comfortable and well-foamed. Instrumentation gauges are clear and analog. With stereo placed above the semi-automatic climate control, one doesn’t need to take the eyes off in order to adjust the stereo. All the switchgears are finished in high-quality, tactical touch. The SACC works nicely with A/C during our mid 10s spring afternoon weather.

The backseat is equally spacious with plenty of leg and headrooms.

Its a bonus for Mitsubishi to use uninstrusive hinges because it won’t crashed into any groceries inside the trunk. The trunk liftover and size are reasonable thanks to 60/40 split fold-down rear seats. Just be careful with your head when the trunk opened because its height has got me a couple of times.

Conclusion: The new Lancer is, indeed, a very impressive car from Mitsubishi. In the past, its hard to find a reason to justify buying a Mitsubishi because it has nothing against its competitions. With the introduction of latest Lancer, it got a whole lot to run with the best of the entry-level car segment. The biggest bonus is the 5-year warranty offers in Mitsubishi which lacks in its rivals. This Lancer, along with the recently introduced Outlander compact ute and Eclipse last year, are showing Mitsubishi is coming back.

OVERALL VERDICT FOR 2008 MITSUBISHI LANCER
=====================================
Performance: 4/5
Handling and ride/fun-to-drive: 4/5
Interior/ergonomics/user-friendliness: 4/5
Fit-and-finish/build quality: 4/5
Cargo/accessibility/layout: 4/5
Value-for-money: 4/5

Overall rating: 4/5

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart/Sportback

Short review for 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart/Sportback
==========================================
Price as tested: CDN$21988
Price as tested: CDN$24198

The single biggest criticisim of Lancer (except Evolution, of course ) has always been power, or therefore lack of. With the introduction of the Ralliart, Mitsu has given Lancer the power that it has always needed it. A 162hp 2.4L MIVEC that feels far more responsive and refined than the 120hp 2.0L in the lower ES and OZ Rally models. The new engine has given a better work out for the chassis. Its not only smoother, its also no longer feels underengined when pushed. The 16″ wheels look sportier and no as undertired in such a tall body. While the handling still remains capable, it continues to suffer from featherweight steering. Interior wise, the use of materials are of high-quality which gives a perception that it no longer feels cheap.

Overall rating: 4.5/5

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer OZ Rally edition

Vehicle: 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer OZ Rally edition with 5-speed stick, optional ABS and sunroof.

Performance: Lancer is powered by a 2.0 that bumps out 120hp and 130 lb/ft of torque. The performance is adequate for the most part, however, it tends to get tiresome as I pushed through the redline. This engine seems to lack the refinement of many of its competitors, say Protege’s 2.0 and Corolla’s 1.8 VVT-i units. The torque delivery is adequate, once again. On the other hand, it tends to run breathlessly as it runs through 120 km/h. The 5-speed stick is definitely not Mitsubishi’s best attribute neither. The throw is long and shift action feels rubbery. The good thing is the clutch is light and progessive.

Handling: Lancer is more of an econocar that tuned toward the comfort over the handling aspect despite of the racy look. The steering response is quick, although it lacks off and on-center feel. The steering feels too light most of the time. While the suspension provides one of the best ride comfort in its class, it tends to lack the flexability when I pushed through corners. There are severe understeer and body rolls. While both are very well under control, it lacks the driving involvement of the class leaders by Mazda, Ford and Nissan. Mitsubishi needs to firm up the suspension in order to put Lancer on the top of the handling chart.

Brakes: The front discs/rear drums brake provide decent pedal feel. The stopping distance is short. The pedal is easily modulated and the effort is balanced. However, given OZ Rally’s 22k price tag. Here lies a problem. You have to take ABS as a package with sunroof. ABS should be a standard equipment because its an active safety feature, however, moonroof is not. If a 20k Protege5 is able to afford an ABS as standard, how come Mitsubishi can’t afford on a 22k Lancer?

Interior: The interior is comfortable and nicely layout. All the climate control knobs are well-placed on top of the center console. The gauges are clear and analog. Both front and rear seats are comfortable. Rear seats have probably the largest interior space in its class. There are plenty of head and legroom. However, here comes the drawbacks. The CD-player has tiny buttons that are hard to navigate. Secondly, the whole center console is covered with cheap and hard plastic. Although the trunk is large and got low liftover, its instrusive trunk hinges is an absolute “no no”.

Conclusion : Mitsubishi expects Lancer to be the biggest seller in the Canadian line-up. However, they have to address a few issues before Lancer is able to take on the top dogs. It needs a higher quality interior, better engine, better dynamic and standard ABS. Although the OZ Rally edition looks like an EVO, its dynamic capabilitis are definitely not an EVO.

OVERALL VERDICT FOR 2003 MITSUBISHI LANCER OZ RALLY EDITION
===================================================
Performance: 2/5
Handling/fun-to-drive: 2.25/5
Interior/ergonomics/user-friendliness: 3/5
Fit-and-finish/build quality: 2.75/5
Cargo/accessibility/layout: 3/5

Overall rating: 2.5/5