<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Direct Shift &#187; CSX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/category/acura/csx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.directshift.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>This is a website for those who are looking for detailed informations and reviews regarding every new vehicle currently available on the market.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Follow-up test: 2009 Acura CSX</title>
		<link>http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/2009/08/31/follow-up-test-2009-acura-csx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/2009/08/31/follow-up-test-2009-acura-csx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vwaudia4</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Acura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Follow-up test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/?p=932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vehicle: 2009 Acura CSX Tech Price as tested: CDN$31385 Unlike its forebear, the EL. The Canadian-only Acura CSX never sold well, even Honda Canada has agreed it isn&#8217;t as a marketing succeed as all the EL preceding it. Dynamically speaking, CSX is a very delightful car to drive. Our tester is the mid-level Tech package [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/2009/08/31/follow-up-test-2009-acura-csx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007 Acura CSX/TL Type-S</title>
		<link>http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/2007/03/24/2007-acura-csxtl-type-s-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/2007/03/24/2007-acura-csxtl-type-s-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 00:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vwaudia4</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Acura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vehicle(s): 2007 Acura CSX Type-S 2007 Acura TL Type-S with 5-speed manumatic Price as tested: CDN$34680 (CSX-S) CDN$49030 (TL-S) Performance: CSX-S is powered by the same powerplant as Civic Si coupe, which means its the same upgraded 2.0 i-VTEC DOHC 4-cylinder 16-valver with 197 ponies and 139 lb/ft of torque. Consider its maximum torque arrives [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/2007/03/24/2007-acura-csxtl-type-s-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 Acura CSX</title>
		<link>http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/2006/02/17/2006-acura-csx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/2006/02/17/2006-acura-csx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vwaudia4</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Acura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vehicle: 2006 Acura CSX Premium with 5-speed automatic transmission Price as tested: CDN$29380 Performance: CSX is powered by the same K20 powerplant as Civic Si. As one expects from Acura, the level of refinement and smoothness are amazing. This DOHC 16-valver 4 banger i-VTEC 2.0L is good for 155 ponies and 139 lb/ft of torque. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.directshift.com/wordpress/2006/02/17/2006-acura-csx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

