Long-term test drive: 2010 Toyota Matrix XR AWD
Vehicle: 2010 Toyota Matrix XR AWD with automatic transmission
Price as tested: CDN$22190
Total mileage of the entire test: 500km
Fuel economy: 9 liters per 100km (70% city/30% urban cycle)
I came away unimpressively when I first drove the 2nd generation of the Toyota Matrix a year ago. So we decided to put Matrix into a long-term drive to see whether spending longer time with its practical Toyota compact wagon would be able to change my mind.
The 158hp 2.4 liter is definitely the engine of choice in the Matrix range, as it provides similar amount of fuel economy as the base 1.8 liter with 136 ponies. In terms of engine refinement, this 2.4 certainly lives up to Toyota’s reputation of producing refined and smooth powertrains. If this 2.4 liter was good enough for higher application in Camry, it certainly be able to live up to Matrix’s purposes. However, 4-speed automatic is the reason why we weren’t able to get the fuel mileage we expect from a compact car. Even though our Matrix is equipped with AWD, it doesn’t mean we can’t get better mileage than an average of 9 liters per 100km. Although you can’t compared a Matrix 2.4 with our long-term Jetta TDI, however, Golf wagon with 2.5 170hp certainly get a little bit better mileage.
When it comes to AWD, we are still unflavorable of Matrix’s proactive system instead of many of its rival’s proactive system. Impreza 2.5i Sport is the car that comes to our mind loud and clear, when its time to compare with Matrix. Another car that is worthy of mentioned is the Suzuki SX4 hatchback, which is intended to get a CVT this year. The CVT alone would generate much superior fuel economy, plus much needed gearbox efficiency for the SX4. We still hate Matrix’s electric power steering, which is completely devoid of feel and feedback.
The most impressive aspect of the Matrix is the cargo area. The completely flat floor with plastic lined across the floor make it more versatile than many of those so-called compact SUVs. Fold the passenger seat flat, even a refrigator can fit into the Matrix with ease. Along with the much-needed washer/wiper for rear windscreen, Matrix’s back end is pretty nicely layout. The only drawback is the lack of flip open rear glass, as with the original Matrix.
Matrix should put into anyone’s shopping list, if they are looking for a practical family wagon with an acceptable AWD and proven engineering. But make sure you try all the competitions before deciding in a Toyota showroom.
Likes:
Styling
Practical interior
Smooth and refined powertrain
Toyota reliability
Dislikes:
4-speed automatic
Poor steering feel
Reactive AWD
Lack of flip open rear glass for back window
Sightlines